|
Post by Tenjen on Aug 25, 2007 22:28:19 GMT -5
lets bring this back.
for those who dont know, just answer the last question best you can and pose one yourself, something you wanna know.
energy and matter is exchangeable right?
|
|
|
Post by Nixie on Aug 26, 2007 0:19:41 GMT -5
It would seem so.
Since gas is made from dead dinosaurs, would killing more dinosaurs make gas prices go down?
|
|
|
Post by Tenjen on Aug 26, 2007 3:53:28 GMT -5
well in the time it will take for compression to make oil all over again, gas prices will be non existant because we'd have run out of it, finally taken alternatives seriously and ended ourselves [or had our ends thrust upon us] sometime later.
In a few million years the earth will have a new race which will eventually start asking the "why" and then "how" questions. When they get their industrial revolution, they'll use the oil that spawned from all those bones [of those o so fascinating biped beings from ancient times] that got compressed over the ages.
How fast is the speed of thought? [ponder*]
|
|
|
Post by Kristal Rose on Aug 26, 2007 7:01:24 GMT -5
LOL I just heard the other day that desert water is full of things like shrimp because they can hibernate for centuries.
One might not think all that fast, but I do believe it is faster than the speed of light. I see thought, especially psychic thought, as tapping in to or being one with the omnipresent mind, so one's channeling, remote viewing, telepathic chat, or teleportation to other galaxies would be way faster than travelling at light speed - instantaneous. Of course that omnipresent mind is omnipresent in time too, so one could be faster that instantly too.
Your choice of questions: What is the oldest music in your collection? What is the wierdest thing you've ever smoked? Will society keep advancing technically, or fall in to some sort of dark ages first?
|
|
|
Post by Nixie on Aug 26, 2007 13:19:04 GMT -5
We'll fall into some sort of dark age first, probably sometime within the next 200 years.
If you could make any fantasy creature real, what would you pick?
|
|
|
Post by Tenjen on Aug 26, 2007 14:34:38 GMT -5
A nymphomanic highschool girl whose...
well i'd say drows.
whats more damagingto youth, japanese perverted content on highshoolers or americas usage of 30 year old beefy actors and acteress with huge busts and thin waist lines as 15 and 16 year olds?
|
|
|
Post by Kristal Rose on Aug 26, 2007 16:45:56 GMT -5
I'm slightly familiar with the Japanese content. The only 30ish actor playing a teen I can think of was Mary Pickford back in the 1920's. I don't think Mary Pickford messed me up much, so I'll go with the Japaanese perverted content. Now if Ren and Stimpy, or Foamy were going as teenagers in all my favorite shows, I'd be messed up. Big busts, that must have been Arnold Schwarzenegger.
What fantasy race would you prefer not move into your neighborhood, but live at least a couple miles away instead?
|
|
|
Post by Tenjen on Aug 26, 2007 17:07:18 GMT -5
drows. Definately Drows. Their nice, but dont make very good neighbours sometimes.
My watch charges itself by my arm movements. Could you please turn it into a stark raving conspiracy theory?
|
|
|
Post by Kristal Rose on Aug 26, 2007 18:41:42 GMT -5
The doppler weather radars capable of seeing mists behind skyscrapers miles away are also capable of identifying people by their doppler profiles, the way they walk, for instance. They can't be identified when their is no pattern of movement to discern, so a variety of products are built to encourage people to move in their unique ways at all times for easy identification, in case a pending revolution needs tracked.
What do you do to reduce your environmental footprint?
|
|
|
Post by AlexTHVK on Aug 26, 2007 19:27:03 GMT -5
Huh.... nothing, really. D=
Do you know what the environmental footprint is?
|
|
|
Post by Tenjen on Aug 27, 2007 1:24:24 GMT -5
i dont know either but i think its the amount of damage each one of us do individually to nature with our everyday actions.
do cats really hate sour things?
|
|
|
Post by Nixie on Aug 27, 2007 2:38:31 GMT -5
No idea.
Environmental Footprint, it's not about how much damage you do, it's about how much land you use to fulfill your daily needs. If you're doing well for the environment, you're using the smallest amount of land possible. And it's not just the property you live on- that's also counting the gas you put in your car, the food you buy at the grocery, the hot air the leaks out of your windows... it's pretty thorough. And I'm not doing anything at all about my footprint, because I can't get a more fuel-efficient car (since I don't have a car at all) or put new windows in, or survive off vegetables.
Did that make any sense?
|
|
|
Post by Tenjen on Aug 27, 2007 3:30:58 GMT -5
Completely.
One of thr charecters in my comic is a large serpent queen [3x to 5x human for her body, not decided on an exact length for her serpent part]. She has 2 reproductive organs, one in her humanoid body and another at the near end of her tail. [one covered by clothing and the other has retractable scales over it.]
What would freud think of her? and me come to think of it?
|
|
|
Post by Gustav on Aug 27, 2007 14:31:03 GMT -5
That you have a strong urge to perform mating. What marks this idea is the attention you gave to descript your characters' reproductive organs. Yet you feel yourself a bit too shy to, in fact. Again analyzing your character, you clothed he... shall we say, "seduction points". And also the fact you picked a naga as basis to make her. A naga is a mythological greek beast akin to mermaids, but using of subversion to attract her victims.
So what you thought of my analysis?
|
|
|
Post by Tenjen on Aug 27, 2007 14:53:36 GMT -5
|
|